An analysis of number of siblings (0, 1, 2+) in relation to vocabulary size at 18 months, and language input over the first 18 months of life.
I’m a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Language and Linguistic Science at the University of York, UK.
I’m currently PI on an ERC-selected/UKRI-funded (through the Horizon Europe Grant Guarantee Scheme) Starting Grant, entitled Identifying the role of sensorimotor feedback as a mechanism of language learning in the first three years of life, or SENFM, for short. This is a 5-year project involving home-recorded data of families over infants’ first year of vocal development. We are running looking preference and lingual ultrasound experiments at key vocal development milestones during this period. Read more about SENFM here.
My research focuses on early language development, and I’m particularly interested in the transition from babble to speech. I’m also interested in the role of iconicity in early language development, specifically why babies acquire so many onomatopoeia in their early words. My work brings together perspectives from production and perception, with a particular focus on phonological development. My research to-date has used eye-tracking and acoustic analysis to observe infants’ perception of language, alongside the consideration of early vocalizations and the manipulation of prosody in infant communication.
PhD in Linguistics, 2015
University of York, UK
MA in Linguistics, 2010
University of York
BA French and German (Language and Linguistics), 2009
University of York
This page is a work in progress - check back soon!
An analysis of the phonological development of early babble, considering the role of caregiver input and the infants’ own …
Collaboration with Dr Serge Sagna (York) analysing geminate consonants in the production of ideophones in Eegimaa.
An analysis of number of siblings (0, 1, 2+) in relation to vocabulary size at 18 months, and language input over the first 18 months of life.
The COVID-19 pandemic, and the resulting closure of daycare centers worldwide, led to unprecedented changes in children’s learning environments. This period of increased time at home with caregivers, with limited access to external sources (e.g., daycares) provides a unique opportunity to examine the associations between the caregiver-child activities and children’s language development. The vocabularies of 1742 children aged8-36 months across 13 countries and 12 languages were evaluated at the beginning and end of the first lockdown period in their respective countries(from March to September 2020). Children who had less passive screen exposure and whose caregivers read more to them showed larger gains in vocabulary development during lockdown, after controlling for SES and other caregiver-child activities. Children also gained more words than expected (based on normative data) during lockdown; either caregivers were more aware of their child’s development or vocabulary development benefited from intense caregiver-child interaction during lockdown.
In this review I bring together the literature on onomatopoeia specifically and iconicity more generally to consider infants’ acquisition from three perspectives - perception, production, and interaction.
This study analyses infants’ early word production to show a phonological motivation for onomatopoeia in early acquisition. Cross-linguistic evidence from 16 infants demonstrates how these forms fit within a phonologically-systematic developing lexicon.
An analysis of naturalistic data, observing the productive vocabulary of 44 17‐month‐olds in relation to mothers’ work status (full time, part time, stay at home) at 6 and 18 months. Infants who experienced a combination of care from mothers and other caretakers had larger productive vocabularies than infants in solely full‐time maternal or solely other‐caretaker care
In a picture-mapping task, 10- and 11-month-old infants showed a processing advantage for onomatopoeia (e.g., woof woof) over their conventional counterparts (e.g., doggie). However, further analysis suggests that the input may play a key role in infants’ experience and processing of these forms.
Onomatopoeic words (e.g. quack) were compared acoustically with their corresponding conventional words (duck). Onomatopoeia were more salient than conventional words across all features measured - mean pitch, pitch range, word duration, repetition, and pause length.
An analysis of longitudinal diary data from one infant acquiring German to seek a better understanding of the role of onomatopoeia in early language development across the first 500 words.
An analysis of longitudinal diary data from one infant acquiring German to seek a better understanding of the role of onomatopoeia in early language development across the first 500 words.
An analysis of longitudinal diary data from one infant acquiring German to seek a better understanding of the role of onomatopoeia in early language development across the first 500 words.
This study uses eye-tracking to single out the role of wild onomatopoeia in language development, as described by Rhodes (1994). Wildness – whereby extra-phonetic features are used in order to reproduce non-human sounds – is thought here to facilitate infants’ understanding of onomatopoeic word forms, providing a salient cue for segmentation and understanding in the input. Infants heard onomatopoeic forms produced in familiar and unfamiliar languages, presented in a phonologically wild (W) or tame (T) manner. W forms in both familiar and unfamiliar languages were hypothesised to elicit longer looking times than T forms in both familiar and unfamiliar languages. Results reflect the role that onomatopoeia play in early language development. Wildness was not found to be a factor in infants’ understanding of word forms, while reduplication and production knowledge of specific stimuli generated consistent responses across participants.